DON'T STICK A FORK IN HER YET........

She's baaaaaack......Don't stick a fork in old Hill just yet, she ain't done. Just when the pundints and the prognosticators were ready to bury the old broad, out of the scrap heap she comes to win New Hampshire. Albeit by a pubic hair thin margin, but a win none the less. Be careful what you wish for folks, because more momentum and more wins in other primaries by Hillary will mean that her next address may damn well be......

   Which in turn would mean at least 4 years of............

   I for one can not handle that thought. Where is Rudy when you need him? I hate to say it but he is the only Republican who has a snow-ball's chance in hell of defeating the Democratic nominee this year. Unless it's John Edwards, and that p***y has no chance at their nomination.

Just a random thought on the day after the primary.................Thanks..............CG

 

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this entry.
Comments

  • 1/9/2008 3:35 PM Wayne McIntyre wrote:
    Shillary won that primary with the women's vote. Because she puddled up? I don't know but if she does it again WE will know it was an act which I personally think it was ,ergo the female vote. Most women wont go for that bit for long.
  • 1/9/2008 5:09 PM LT wrote:
    You know as I think about her victory speech last night where she said "..."along the way I found my voice" I think if I were Sigmund Frued, I would take that as her really saying.....

    " It's okay to cry and you all fell for it...."

    LT...
  • 1/9/2008 7:04 PM Wayne McIntyre wrote:
    ....... If bullshit was music she'd be a brass band.
  • 1/9/2008 9:24 PM JT wrote:
    You're scared of the Clintons, as am I. But I'm also scared of Obama, Giuliani, and Romney. I'm not sure who would be the best of that lot.
  • 1/10/2008 9:30 AM Skunkfeathers wrote:
    I would like to think that if Hilarity gets the jackass nod, she'll be the great Unifier of Republicans across the spectrum, regardless of who winds up with the Republican nod. If that's not the case, then dissaffected Republican voters need only remember 2006 to see what disgruntled non-participation got them. VOTE OR DIE! should be the Republican mantra in '08, cuz if Dems get full control, forget the war on terror, and a return to becoming domestic targets of opportunity.
  • 1/10/2008 3:11 PM JT wrote:
    Everyone keeps yelling that they want "change"...that's exactly what they will get on their paychecks if a Democrat takes office. All of the programs and promises they are touting are going to cost a ton of money, and taxes will go through the roof. So much so that "change" is all that will be left on your paycheck at the end of the week...the rest goes to the feds!
  • 1/10/2008 4:34 PM Annie wrote:
    Bahhh....mumble, mumble, mumble......
    *heavy sighs of disgust since Monday - reason for my cyber absence*

    On the one hand you have the dems...all marxist jihadi ass kissers...Hillary in the tank with arab money and an arab personal assistant (Huma)...Obamalama with jihadi cousins in Kenya in which Kenyan officials mentioned his jihadi asskissing ways. All pro-death, all contemptuous, all dirty tricksters.

    On the other hand, we have the repubs, two of which should be running for the other side, one should be running as a cornflake supported by skinheads/truthers, and the rest have an assortment of qualities we have picked apart until we are disgusted with everyone. The most conservative ones can't find a microphone or the cash, the ones talking good sense about business and healthcare are being attacked by the dem-lites, who want them out of the race before real repubs can get out and vote.

    And can someone please explain to me, a product of the city public schools, why independents are allowed to vote in the other party's caucusses when they made the choice to not claim either party? In some cases, even dems have been voting for repub candidates. How in hell does that fly?
  • 1/10/2008 4:45 PM Annie wrote:
    Check out this smackdown of Hillary by a lib chick. Problem is, she is a mirror image of feminazi Hillary and like all libtards, she can see nothing when she looks in the mirror.

    http://www.salon.com/opinion/paglia/2008/01/10/hillary/

    Hillary's willingness to tolerate Bill's compulsive philandering is a function of her general contempt for men. She distrusts them and feels morally superior to them. Following the pattern of her long-suffering mother, she thinks it is her mission to endure every insult and personal degradation for a higher cause -- which, unlike her self-sacrificing mother, she identifies with her near-messianic personal ambition.

    It's no coincidence that Hillary's staff has always consisted mostly of adoring women, with nerdy or geeky guys forming an adjunct brain trust. Hillary's rumored hostility to uniformed military men and some Secret Service agents early in the first Clinton presidency probably belongs to this pattern. And let's not forget Hillary, the governor's wife, pulling out a book and rudely reading in the bleachers during University of Arkansas football games back in Little Rock.

    Hillary's disdain for masculinity fits right into the classic feminazi package, which is why Hillary acts on Gloria Steinem like catnip. Steinem's fawning, gaseous New York Times op-ed about her pal Hillary this week speaks volumes about the snobby clubbiness and reactionary sentimentality of the fossilized feminist establishment, which has blessedly fallen off the cultural map in the 21st century. History will judge Steinem and company very severely for their ethically obtuse indifference to the stream of working-class women and female subordinates whom Bill Clinton sexually harassed and abused, enabled by look-the-other-way and trash-the-victims Hillary......

    ... However, I remain concerned about her future conduct of high-level diplomacy. Contemptuous condescension seems to be Hillary's default mode with any male who criticizes her or stands in her way. It's a Nixonian reflex steeped in toxic gender bias. How will that play in the Muslim world?


    Newsflash to Camille, Hillary has no intention in dealing with the muslim world, just like Bill didn't, unless it will be in the form of campaign donations to the highest bidder of American sovereignty. Her target is our wallets.

    And as for Obama, some muslims may see him as an apostate, unless he panders accordingly....something he has already shown he could do.
  • 1/10/2008 6:10 PM Wayne McIntyre wrote:
    .Hey Annie. Good to have you back. We have missed you.
Leave a comment

Comments are closed.